Jump to content
BenBeau

Are conservation areas respected enough by Planning?

Recommended Posts

2 articles in today’s Star newspaper report on planning decisions to permit building in conservation areas, despite objections.

1.     Netherthorpe: New flats can be built in conservation area.  (Read more at: https://www.thestar.co.uk/our-towns-and-cities/sheffield/new-flats-can-be-built-in-conservation-area-1-9310372)

As part of planning conditions, developers will pay £31,000 to Sheffield Council for traffic management, and a further £50,000 to South Yorkshire Passenger Transport to develop the Netherthorpe Road Tram Stop.

2.   Hanover Conservation Area.    Historic building can have modern extension despite objections (Read more at: https://www.thestar.co.uk/our-towns-and-cities/sheffield/historic-building-can-have-modern-extension-despite-objections-1-9309557)

 

Brian Holmshaw, who was speaking on behalf of Sheffield’s heritage community, told the committee: “There’s no objection to the scale or massing of this extension, it’s the design that’s an issue."

Coun Rob Murphy said: “It is not in keeping with the conservation area and sticks out rather than blends in. It’s not appropriate.”

Coun Peter Price said: “One of the beauties of Glossop Road is the variety of buildings and this is certainly better than the blank white wall which is currently there.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of it comes down to money at the end of the day. Plus meeting targets on things like housebuilding.

However heritage construction is often overpriced. And to make things fit in with what's there, is more expensive than using cheap mass produced building materials. For example if you were told that the extension to your property would require to be made of Tudor bricks. The question is who makes Tudor bricks these days and of course anyone that does probably will charge 4 times the price of a standard house brick.

I have heard that there are little incentives in the form of tax relief on heritage projects. So it is cheaper to build something new, than having land doing nothing. Hence Peter Price's comment.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Council can only reject an application on good planning grounds. A failed application can always betaken to appeal and this can, and does, cost the Council money....as witness the planning application for Jessop's Hospital. Planning Councillors do not need any special qualifications in planning or architecture. Ones opinion might be diametrically opposed to an others...hence they rely heavily on their Officers guidance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In direct answer to the question, NO THEY ARE NOT. The planning panel are mostly unqualified to make an individual true assesment of the plan put forward in a sensitive conservation area. They read the paperwork proposals, but unless they have actually been to the area, and investigated how a planned building will affect the 'neighbouring properties', and talked to 'local people', directly taking on board the issues they have, they truly are NOT respectful of the reason WHY it is a CONSERVATION AREA. It was made a CONSERVATION AREA for a REASON.  We all know of heritage buildings and areas lost to this WONDERFUL CITY, by past planning panels shocking decisions.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×